<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> Not sure what the arguments made by that CISO boil down to.</p><p>Is it &quot;you don&#39;t get to have a say because you aren&#39;t rich and powerful&quot;?</p><p>Or is it &quot;you are considered the lowest, rawest form of commodity because you don&#39;t exactly follow the business logic we dogmatically assume&quot;?</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> Wow, that's certain <em>a</em> take: "we're making money by using the stuff you created and explicitly disclaimed any warranty for, we're not paying you for it, but boy howdy are we going to hold you liable if any fault in it gets in the way of us making money (that we won't be compensating you with)."</p><p>I'm struggling to find a polite response, tbh. Or even one involving more than two words.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@gamingonlinux" class="u-url mention">@<span>gamingonlinux</span></a></span> Freedesktop SDK 23.08 &gt; Ubuntu 22.04.4, I didn&#39;t think I&#39;d see this so quickly.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@gamingonlinux" class="u-url mention">@<span>gamingonlinux</span></a></span> I supported through <a href="https://mastodon.xyz/tags/Liberapay" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Liberapay</span></a>, but looks like you stopped accepting donations there ?</p><p><a href="https://fr.liberapay.com/gamingonlinux" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="">fr.liberapay.com/gamingonlinux</span><span class="invisible"></span></a></p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@sushee" class="u-url mention">@<span>sushee</span></a></span> <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29ayN0ExAFw" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">youtube.com/watch?v=29ayN0ExAF</span><span class="invisible">w</span></a></p><p>Alt: metal gear solid sound effect (Alert)</p>

<p>you are not a twig</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://types.pl/@toastal" class="u-url mention">@<span>toastal</span></a></span> Well if the new comment style is what is defined in the RFC it makes sense to change it.<br />I personally don’t care too much how things look as long as everything looks the same.</p><p>As for the .envrc I think it makes sense as well as it defines how the development environment should be. However I don’t know why they don’t use `use flakes`.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span></p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://fosstodon.org/@kev" class="u-url mention">@<span>kev</span></a></span> this is better ending from the other possibilities... 😅</p>