<p><span class="h-card"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> they get their traits at the traiteur</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://with.iridium.ink/@artemis" class="u-url mention">@<span>artemis</span></a></span> i do this all the time yes</p>

<p>OH: &quot;catgirl exhibiting documentation seeking behavior&quot;</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> </p><p>:blobcatno: <code>impl</code><br>:blobcatyes: <code>sus</code></p>

<p>existence of traits implies the existence of traitors (those who trait)</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://donotsta.re/users/mwk" class="u-url mention">@<span>mwk</span></a></span> </p><p>....ok but do you have that diagram? because now I&#39;m curious about what constitutes juice vs. crunch as regards macros.</p>

<p>context: <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://donotsta.re/users/mwk" class="u-url mention">@<span>mwk</span></a></span> has described my newest macro rules as &quot;juicy&quot; and i decided to make them crunchy as a result</p>

<p>&gt; looking for a new library<br />&gt; ask the author if the macros inside are juicy or crunchy<br />&gt; she doesn&#39;t understand<br />&gt; pull out illustrated diagram explaining what is juicy and what is crunchy<br />&gt; she laughs and says &quot;they&#39;re good macros sir&quot;<br />&gt; spend 5 minutes compiling it<br />&gt; its juicy</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@gamingonlinux" class="u-url mention">@<span>gamingonlinux</span></a></span> BlueSky isn’t great either</p>