<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@ronya" class="u-url mention">@<span>ronya</span></a></span> oh, hm. i&#39;m not very familiar with the distinction then</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> that’s also the case for non-WHQL signed kernel drivers though. WHQL is optional for that.</p>

<p>... wait, windbg has gdbserver support and can debug linux processes</p><p>i could already do this</p><p>unfortunately it&#39;s not very usable because it doesn&#39;t know how to parse ELF files. someone should write a DWARF to PDB converter lmao</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.catgirl.cloud/@multisn8" class="u-url mention">@<span>multisn8</span></a></span> supposedly people have been using gdb too</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@ronya" class="u-url mention">@<span>ronya</span></a></span> yeah. a driver that can be loaded on a kernel with testsigning disabled</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> not that it makes much of a difference, but are you talking about something that’s WHQL signed?</p>

<p>windbg&#39;s user interface is absolutely fucked in concept, but ... it&#39;s actually usable? i am effective with it?? it doesn&#39;t require me to work around a lack of features constantly??? it doesn&#39;t require me to remember fifteen-word incantations with strict syntax checking to do something very basic????</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> yesssss!</p>

<p>i kind of want to make a windbg-inspired debugger for linux now</p>