<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/@markusde" class="u-url mention">@<span>markusde</span></a></span> u</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://types.pl/@ionchy" class="u-url mention">@<span>ionchy</span></a></span> pics or it didn’t happen</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://types.pl/@ionchy" class="u-url mention">@<span>ionchy</span></a></span> yeah now ur part of the weaker species</p>

<p>I mean, the seduction of novel ceremony is that - like new frameworks, like React, like Kubernetes - it provides structure without accountability. If the process fails it is the process’s fault, not its drivers, not its leaders. </p><p>Dan Davies created the term “accountability sink” - a kind of heat sink for diffusing human consequences, a useful term. We should recognize these things for what they are, I think, and more importantly when people are trying to create them, for whatever reason.</p>

it's fun going around kansai with fedifriends :cirno_bliss:

@solidsanek@outerheaven.club outer heaven dot club, ten thousand years!

When you try to chat someone up but they just hit you with that toxic maculopathy stare

<p>I sometimes fear that there is some deep set cultural drive in this industry to run from its problems instead of solving them, to genuflect to novelty rather than engage with the failures of the present. To rewrite code instead of fixing it, to adopt weird new ceremonies instead of understanding the details of the present. To throw it all out and start over, believing you’ve learned from the last iteration without really interrogating it. It smells of a sort of hyperactive nihilism.</p>

@lain@lain.com @solidsanek@outerheaven.club sike didn’t have time to visit nara this time