Whole-known-network
<p>also trying to fix some gaps like them not publishing what material they use for Tg135-140 dielectric. this relates to a huge gotcha in their quote system, where Nan Ya Plastics NP-155F is the material they assume for impedance control but FR-4 Tg135-140 is the default material for 4 and 6 layer boards *regardless* of whether you select an impedance controlled stackup. it doesn't switch it for you. if you don't select Tg150 manually, the impedance will be wrong on the manufactured board.</p>
<p>fixing JLC's docs by asking questions whose correct answers contradict errors in their docs</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@stacksmashing" class="u-url mention">@<span>stacksmashing</span></a></span> is that a TI part that's a successor to TPS65983B?</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@endospore" class="u-url mention">@<span>endospore</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://toot.cat/@zeenix" class="u-url mention">@<span>zeenix</span></a></span> (as a language designer, I disagree. the terms you choose are a part of the overall experience of using your language, and we don't use "cmon it's just a feature" to justify something people routinely have a hard time with; we try to improve on it. it is completely reasonable to expect Rust to improve on this, too)</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://hachyderm.io/@oli" class="u-url mention">@<span>oli</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://toot.cat/@zeenix" class="u-url mention">@<span>zeenix</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://hackers.town/@vertigo" class="u-url mention">@<span>vertigo</span></a></span> is it actually quick if everyone involved has to look it up?</p>
<p>Today's latest news in cat scientific discoveries: <br>Soap does not, in fact, taste good. 🧼</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@dabeaz" class="u-url mention">@<span>dabeaz</span></a></span> Man, that is disappointing to hear, but does make sense.</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://toot.cat/@zeenix" class="u-url mention">@<span>zeenix</span></a></span> It's a simple word paired with not-so-simple behavior and properties. "What is the relationship between C<T> and C<U> when T is a U" is an inspiring and straightforward question but you can't use it to substitute "variance" in conversations.</p><p>Or put it more simply: c'mon it's just a word, you've learnt countless words on the way to programming and this one is no different. And as I've said it's as fundamental as "generics" and "inheritance".</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@david_chisnall" class="u-url mention">@<span>david_chisnall</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://notacult.social/@carbontwelve" class="u-url mention">@<span>carbontwelve</span></a></span> This sort of cost benefit analysis is crucial and missing in so much of the discussion around generative AI!</p><p>On the other hand, without intending to diminish it at all, it sort of characterizes all programing as equally serious or something, which obviously isn't true. </p><p>In plenty of programming "the costs of generating incorrect code even 1% of the time are" pretty inconsequential, actually.</p>
