2
<p><a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/03/diseases-doge-trump/681964/?utm_source=copy-link&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=share" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/</span><span class="invisible">2025/03/diseases-doge-trump/681964/?utm_source=copy-link&amp;utm_medium=social&amp;utm_campaign=share</span></a></p>
<p>The Triple-i Initiative gaming showcase returns for 2025 with a teaser <a href="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2025/03/the-triple-i-initiative-gaming-showcase-returns-for-2025-with-a-teaser/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">gamingonlinux.com/2025/03/the-</span><span class="invisible">triple-i-initiative-gaming-showcase-returns-for-2025-with-a-teaser/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/IndieGames" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>IndieGames</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Gaming" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Gaming</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/PCGaming" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>PCGaming</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/SteamDeck" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>SteamDeck</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/LinuxGaming" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>LinuxGaming</span></a></p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> I wondered. That&#39;s not at all clear from the page found via search for FX2LP. All the marketing hype is still on the page. It&#39;ll probably take a minute before they never take that down. :-(</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@poleguy" class="u-url mention">@<span>poleguy</span></a></span> &quot;the government wants to use it to make something more important than FX2&#39;s&quot;</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@poleguy" class="u-url mention">@<span>poleguy</span></a></span> CYUSB2014 is the 2.0-only version of FX3 that&#39;s overpriced garbage and offers zero compatibility with FX2LP</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@poleguy" class="u-url mention">@<span>poleguy</span></a></span> FX2LP is CY7C68013A only</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> I&#39;m not familiar with the fab or what security implications it has. But I&#39;m afraid the term &quot;national security reasons&quot; is a blanket term that could mean anything, especially these days.</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> Interestingly there website still lists FX2LP parts as &quot;active and preferred.&quot; Am I looking at the wrong part?</p><p><a href="https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/product/universal-serial-bus/usb-2.0-peripheral-controllers/ez-usb-fx2lp-fx2g2-usb-2.0-peripheral-controller/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">infineon.com/cms/en/product/un</span><span class="invisible">iversal-serial-bus/usb-2.0-peripheral-controllers/ez-usb-fx2lp-fx2g2-usb-2.0-peripheral-controller/</span></a></p>
Attached image 0
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@poleguy" class="u-url mention">@<span>poleguy</span></a></span> I wonder if the fab was sold for national security reasons more than anything?</p><p>there is a Chinese clone of the ASIC that we&#39;ll evaluate</p>