2
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> oh he went out of his way to suck off palintir? i was under the naive assumption that he might have felt some shame.</p><p>absolutely fuck this man</p>
<p>British MPs have voted to decriminalise abortion, marking the biggest step forward in reproductive rights in almost 60 years.</p><p>(Abortion was previously legal in limited circumstances in the UK, but during COVID police began charging women under a law from 1861: they can no longer be prosecuted.)</p><p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/17/decriminalisation-abortion-vote-mps" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theguardian.com/politics/2025/</span><span class="invisible">jun/17/decriminalisation-abortion-vote-mps</span></a></p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> it is very familiar with the concept</p>
<p>As the government takes extreme measures to crack down on immigrants&#39; and protestors&#39; rights, “you can easily see how ALPRs, which is an extremely invasive technology, could be weaponized against that community,” EFF’s Jennifer Pinsof told <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@404mediaco" class="u-url mention">@<span>404mediaco</span></a></span>. <a href="https://www.404media.co/california-cops-investigate-immigration-protest-with-ai-camera-system/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">404media.co/california-cops-in</span><span class="invisible">vestigate-immigration-protest-with-ai-camera-system/</span></a></p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.treehouse.systems/@rcombs" class="u-url mention">@<span>rcombs</span></a></span> If Mastodon gGmbH, in consultation with their lawyers, concludes they need a legal means of revoking the implicit or explicit license granted to federated servers, then: They could write one. They have a lawyer, apparently. Instead, at the moment, they are amending their license to grant an irrevokable license from me to Mastodon gGmbH, but not writing a means for me to revoke use by themselves or (though I don&#39;t think this part is necessary) federated servers, and that creates a problem</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.treehouse.systems/@rcombs" class="u-url mention">@<span>rcombs</span></a></span> If Mastodon gGMBH has not granted a license to federated servers, and I delete the comment, and some server somewhere continues to host the content, I send a takedown to the federated server, they take it down because they have no grounds on which to continue mirroring it. Mastodon gGmbH doesn&#39;t have to do anything, everyone is happy.</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> amazing concept <a href="https://mastodon.top/tags/lang_en" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>lang_en</span></a></p>
<p>concept: &quot;will it blend&quot; but it&#39;s about an it/its headmate</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://wandering.shop/@Canageek" class="u-url mention">@<span>Canageek</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@tubetime" class="u-url mention">@<span>tubetime</span></a></span> thank you, this is extremely useful context</p>