<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://socks.masto.host/@John" class="u-url mention">@<span>John</span></a></span> yeah, for most cases logical separation of duties is all that&#39;s really needed, and something like BSD&#39;s jails would be well suited without as much computational overhead.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@gsuberland" class="u-url mention">@<span>gsuberland</span></a></span> I would think the actual cloud companies are trying to keep their excess capacity down in order to control costs, but yeah. I do rebel against the idea that a small Unix/Linux box needs containers to do just a few things. Unix is good at doing a few things.</p>

<p>I often wonder just how much wasted energy Docker alone is responsible for, globally, in terms of duplication and repetition of environment setup tasks across instances.</p><p>I&#39;m not sure I actually want to know the answer.</p>

<p>Okay, Mastodon all hooked up!</p>

<p>Windows compatibility layer Wine 10.0 third Release Candidate out now <a href="https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2024/12/windows-compatibility-layer-wine-100-third-release-candidate-out-now/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">gamingonlinux.com/2024/12/wind</span><span class="invisible">ows-compatibility-layer-wine-100-third-release-candidate-out-now/</span></a></p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Wine" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Wine</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/Linux" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>Linux</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/OpenSource" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>OpenSource</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.social/tags/FOSS" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>FOSS</span></a></p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@gamingonlinux" class="u-url mention">@<span>gamingonlinux</span></a></span> <br />I&#39;ve had this problem before. It doesn&#39;t exist yet. On the page you have to initialize something maybe JavaScript after it&#39;s created and then you can send the url. At least that&#39;s my two cents there may be newer better ways to do it.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://haunted.computer/@iximeow" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>iximeow</span></a></span> I suspect that a big part of the 'computer people' vs 'not computer people' split is similar to the experience eating capsicum. When you eat capsicum, it causes pain and your body then creates dopamine to counter the pain. For a lot of people, the dopamine effect is greater than the pain and so the overall experience is pleasant (there was a fascinating experiment a few years ago that fed people chillies and blocked the dopamine response: universally, everyone hated the taste of chillies, even people who loved them normally).</p><p>Everyone gets frustrated by computers doing the wrong thing for bizarre reasons (which may be a simple misnamed thing), but some people really enjoy the experience that you get after you've found and fixed the problem. Whether that joy outweighs the suffering varies a lot between people.</p>

<p>Will see if I can do the same for Bluesky too.</p>

<p>Had an interesting idea.</p><p>Since we auto-post to Mastodon, I&#39;m gonna grab the link, and add that to the bottom of articles so people know where to go for Mastodon / Fedi comments.</p>