Whole-known-network
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.nathandyer.me/@nathan" class="u-url mention">@<span>nathan</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@mcc" class="u-url mention">@<span>mcc</span></a></span> *half a billion* jesus</p>
<p>Oh! I've just watched the first 5 mins, definitely going to watch it all. She's legit already funny.</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.social/@kottke/113165803319008468" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">mastodon.social/@kottke/113165</span><span class="invisible">803319008468</span></a></p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@danluu" class="u-url mention">@<span>danluu</span></a></span> at my uni students run a network of groups for each assignment. A lot of spam comes from userbots that go into public groups, list all users and search all links to other groups.</p><p>We've seen bot X see al ink and a different boyt joins that group almost immediately :C</p>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrDzGG1xNAM
new tehsnakerer
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.sachachua.com/@sacha" class="u-url mention">@<span>sacha</span></a></span> Is it somehow related to the following rather lengthy emacs-devel thread or just a coincidence? </p><p><a href="https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2024-09/msg00318.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">lists.gnu.org/archive/html/ema</span><span class="invisible">cs-devel/2024-09/msg00318.html</span></a></p>
<p>What I'm listening to today: "Bionic Emphasis", VOUNΔ</p><p>Filipino hyperpop with smooth jungle beats. Music for surviving re-entry</p><p><a href="https://voun.bandcamp.com/track/bionic-emphasis" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">voun.bandcamp.com/track/bionic</span><span class="invisible">-emphasis</span></a></p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@gamingonlinux" class="u-url mention">@<span>gamingonlinux</span></a></span></p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@mcc" class="u-url mention">@<span>mcc</span></a></span> I also am not sure that I really buy the argument that they need *more* money. They get $510 million from Google in a single year. Even at a $200k salary, that's over 2500 devs that could be working on Firefox (and Thunderbird) development full-time. Surely that's enough? Especially if you don't keep shoveling on ads and AI "features."</p>
<p>A thing that is *deeply* confusing to me about recent Mozilla Discourse is many people going "well, of course they have to get money somehow" in response to Mozilla doing things that have no obvious revenue source attached. There is no disclosed revenue stream from "AI Chatbot" and their claimed future plans for the feature sound actively hard to monetize. "Ad Measurement" is by design not directly monetizable. But these features are widely defended on grounds of the nonexistent revenue stream</p>