Whole-known-network
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://donotsta.re/users/mei" class="u-url mention">@<span>mei</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@profdc9" class="u-url mention">@<span>profdc9</span></a></span> yeah, the ICAO methodology uses a factor of 3.16 <a href="https://applications.icao.int/icec/Methodology%20ICAO%20Carbon%20Emissions%20Calculator_v13_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">applications.icao.int/icec/Met</span><span class="invisible">hodology%20ICAO%20Carbon%20Emissions%20Calculator_v13_Final.pdf</span></a></p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> the double blind experiment, the guy they only claimed to strap in, soaring through the air with painless eyes</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@film_girl" class="u-url mention">@<span>film_girl</span></a></span> @alexhcranz Nice! Though I hoped a crossposting app would dedupe on the consumption side?</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@profdc9" class="u-url mention">@<span>profdc9</span></a></span> and I guess more to the specific point of people putting themselves in danger, even despite Boeing's reckless attitude and the difference in approach you highlight, aviation is the safest it's ever been</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@profdc9" class="u-url mention">@<span>profdc9</span></a></span> I do, yeah! my personal view is that decreasing the emissions of aviation is properly done by a 9mm in the back of the head of every billionaire with a private jet. however, it is still true that engineering is always about tradeoffs (even when you're knowingly overengineering it!) and that seemingly reasonable people disagree where these tradeoffs should lie, like how I've tried to illustrate above</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://cloudisland.nz/@ewenmcneill" class="u-url mention">@<span>ewenmcneill</span></a></span> I mean I have that kind of attribute and even then I balk at _this_ level of disregard</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> You know people fly in those planes, right? People who put themselves in danger and don't have to?</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@profdc9" class="u-url mention">@<span>profdc9</span></a></span> (tilts head back and stares into the ceiling) "every kg of fuel burnt carrying overengineered parts of the airplane is three kg of CO₂ emissions that cause global warming!"</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> Nowadays its: "We're contractually allowed to have this much structural failure..." The word overengineering has disappeared from the lexicon.</p>