Whole-known-network
It's just data mining practice.
@vaartis@pl.kotobank.ch @disarray@layer02.net its asking which generation is being talked about "this generation"
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@dlharmon" class="u-url mention">@<span>dlharmon</span></a></span> SPI seems like one of those not-quite-actually-standard things where people take very loose interpretations and almost any assumption you make (e.g. 8-bit transfer size) is going to come and bite you with some obscure chip.</p><p>So when designing software libraries or hardware modules I would err on the side of making it as configurable as possible.</p><p>Can I point to a specific chip that breaks in mode 3 off the top of my head? No. Do I think one is out there? Absolutely.</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://sunny.garden/@dikgelukkig" class="u-url mention">@<span>dikgelukkig</span></a></span> </p><p>I loved "Perfect Marriage Revenge," but I haven't see any of the others you mentioned. I'm going to have to look them up.</p><p><a href="https://techhub.social/tags/kDrama" class="mention hashtag" rel="tag">#<span>kDrama</span></a></p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@dlharmon" class="u-url mention">@<span>dlharmon</span></a></span> Just the first thing that occurred to me.</p><p>I have seen "SPI" devices in which the "chip select" is actually used as an end-of-byte strobe (it's normally low and pulses high briefly after each byte of data is transferred).</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://woem.space/users/aismallard" class="u-url mention">@<span>aismallard</span></a></span> hi! nya</p>
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> meeeeeeeeeow</p>
@whitequark@mastodon.social meow! hi catgirl!
<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://ioc.exchange/@azonenberg" class="u-url mention">@<span>azonenberg</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://chaos.social/@dlharmon" class="u-url mention">@<span>dlharmon</span></a></span> wouldn't glitches on SCK not matter if CS# is tracking the rail? (and if you can make CS# track the rail you could make SCK do the same)</p><p>the question I'm trying to answer here is whether anyone would be unhappy if amaranth-stdio would provide only mode 3 (and mode 1 because you can invert any signal)</p>