<p>Thinking to myself how it’s a good day like today when I don’t get a paper cut and…</p><p>… sticker backing paper smarts yo.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://nixnet.social/users/frankie" class="u-url mention">@<span>frankie</span></a></span> :blobcatpeek:</p>

@rin@post.ebin.club @meeper@udongein.xyz its kinda normal for this to happen when cultures split. trade is what polyglots languages and cultures together. when they stop doing that, their shibboleths start to diverge. irish and scottish galige were in a similar state where they had the same grammar but they chose to use different words for the same things. one called it a pond, the other a lake, same as english dialects do these days. maybe eastern europeans are just way more violently insistent about their non-differences than everyone else :youmusip:

<p>New Facebook model sounding like a student in an oral test, trying to guess the answer by interpreting the teacher&#39;s facial expression, tentatively going down one route, noticing a twitch in the teacher&#39;s eyebrow, backtracking, ...</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://botsin.space/@computerchroniclesbot" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>computerchroniclesbot</span></a></span> Remember when computer UI's made effective use of the screen area?</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://botsin.space/@computerchroniclesbot" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">@<span>computerchroniclesbot</span></a></span> Remember when computer UI's made effective use of the screen area?</p>

@rin@post.ebin.club @icedquinn@blob.cat also just a product of how sanskrit was a very early attempt to formalize language and etymology and how prakrits (the local vernaculars which *descended* from sanskrit; which was more that these were respective descendedanrs of very early forms of indo-aryan, and sanskrit was more a *purification* and extreme formalisation of languages on common ground based on vedic (which was itself a collection of very early dialects)

@rin@post.ebin.club @icedquinn@blob.cat bihari languages and western hindi languages are simmilar and often are conaidered dialects of hindi when bihari (or eastern hindi languages) are actually more related to bengali and hindi to Gujarati Also while rajasthanj, which itself diverged from a very early form of Gujarati it is much more grammatically close to hindi and often considered a hindi language there is a wave effect seen from punjabi to bihari, where punjabi-haryanvi has a rough more sonourous sounding and biharis being smoother ans simmilarly with language and dialect; haryanvi is definitely very related to hindi but i am not sure of punjabi however it did evolve a very hindi like grammar this wave effect is a product of how literature was since prakrit times written in a very homogenous dialect encompassing language; how different stages of language were used literally well beyond their passing and developing their own self sustained identity and a bunch of thigns which completely disappeared as the englishisms got worse

@meeper@udongein.xyz @icedquinn@blob.cat not really, both are east slavic languages. haven't heard of phenomenon you describe before though, what are some examples?