<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@shriramk" class="u-url mention">@<span>shriramk</span></a></span> to be fair, it&#39;s weird for us Canadians too</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.restless.systems/@ChartreuseK" class="u-url mention">@<span>ChartreuseK</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@G_glop" class="u-url mention">@<span>G_glop</span></a></span> exactly my question!!</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://social.treehouse.systems/@xsk" class="u-url mention">@<span>xsk</span></a></span> that makes me really happy to hear! </p><p>do you have any interest in SWO integration in probe-rs?</p>

<p>My mind boggled the first time I was walked around some major Canadian city and came across a Hudson&#39;s Bay Company store. It&#39;d be like walking around Kolkota and running into an East India Company store—not just the same name but also the same company.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> this is false actually. signal integrity is a scam from big pcb to sell more layers</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@G_glop" class="u-url mention">@<span>G_glop</span></a></span> who&#39;s doing JTAG at 2.7GHz?</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> <br />Nokia used to push 900 - 1000MHz through long pin headers in the TMN-1 NMT900 mobile phone. <br />And a few other places, but that&#39;s the highest frequency I have seen. <br />Others are &lt;500MHz.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mas.to/@NormalOperator" class="u-url mention">@<span>NormalOperator</span></a></span> Privacy concerns arise a lot in city council discussion of Flock, but they&#39;re countered by people (usually PDs) saying &quot;there&#39;s no personally identifiable information recorded&quot; along with an explanation that &quot;only the plate and rear of car is recorded.&quot; So, all of this privacy discussion gets redirected to the video footage and the idea they don&#39;t snap pictures of the driver.</p><p>It&#39;s a pretty neat sleight of hand, I&#39;ll give them that.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mas.to/@NormalOperator" class="u-url mention">@<span>NormalOperator</span></a></span> I&#39;m no lawyer, but one impression that I got from the contracts (and even associated presentations about Flock) is that a big emphasis is made to the city that only *they* own the &quot;data&quot; and that it&#39;s deleted after 30 days.</p><p>But, what is actually meant by &quot;data?&quot; A lot of attention is directed to the idea of &quot;data&quot; being raw video footage of the car on the frontend, but very little is said about metadata on the backend. Yet, that backend data is far more useful.</p>