<p>Ok this is definitely not right. Not sure what&#39;s going on exactly but these frames have a bad FCS.</p><p>Looking at the decode I see 0x0a 02 06 fc which is 10.2.6.252, the router interface on my lab sandbox network. All of the early bytes of the packet look right for an ARP reply.</p><p>But then at the end we have 0x0a 02 then a long string of zeroes then 0x06fc. I think somehow the last two bytes of the packet are ending up after the padding added to bring the ARP frame up to 64 bits, or something?</p><p>Not sure what to make of this, but it makes no sense.</p>

<p>Working on the 10GbE issue now. It&#39;s not playing nice, the firmware is seeing packets but replies from the firmware aren&#39;t going anywhere. Wireshark isn&#39;t seeing anything which probably means the problem is lower level than that (corrupted frames with bad CRC).</p><p>Time to fire up my trusty layer 1 packet sniffer.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mas.to/@MikeBeas" class="u-url mention">@<span>MikeBeas</span></a></span> exactly! Also the share url has been changed to a legit google blog url which is also hilarious.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@siracusa" class="u-url mention">@<span>siracusa</span></a></span> To me, as an EU citizen, the DMA seems fairly well written. In that it requests broad and sweeping accomodations and does not specify details that can be trivially wormed around.</p><p>If Apple came in with a proper solution that they thought was good for competition I doubt there would be this much back-and-forth and revisions.</p><p>I don&#39;t believe there is a much more clearly written DMA that would have given them a sufficiently flexible cudgel with which to achieve the spirit of the law.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.mallegolhansen.com/@philip" class="u-url mention">@<span>philip</span></a></span> totally! What cleared it up for me was the domain.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@film_girl" class="u-url mention">@<span>film_girl</span></a></span> Given that they did .zip, it really wasn’t clear to me if it was a joke.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Meyerweb" class="u-url mention">@<span>Meyerweb</span></a></span> Correct. The court absolved itself of picking a clearly unconstitutional and unscientific policy by kicking it into a referendum so they could avoid making a decision. </p><p>Though, recall, Solomon proposed the solution because he was faced with a liar and a truth teller. He used it to provoke the truth—in this case, the referendum passing—so perhaps giving more credit to the court than I intend.</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://twit.social/@glennf" class="u-url mention">@<span>glennf</span></a></span> The idiom still seems inflammatorily chosen.</p>