<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@forestfern" class="u-url mention">@<span>forestfern</span></a></span> hello beautiful fern 🌿</p>

<p>They also need to provide an at-cost syndication of the search index to any who want it for <strong>ten years</strong> to correct for anticompetitive behavior in the market.</p><p>Basically, Google has to give competitors a card to the Library of Babylon.</p><p>Ten. Years. Search will never be the same.</p>

<p>There's more to this remedy than just the sell-off. Let's read some PDFs, gang.</p><p>Note: these are DoJ's proposals for the remedy. The ruling of the Court will happen (or not??) in April.</p><p><a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25356126-doj-proposed-final-judgement-of-google-search-remedies" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">documentcloud.org/documents/25</span><span class="invisible">356126-doj-proposed-final-judgement-of-google-search-remedies</span></a></p><p><strong>Google is prohibited from disincentivizing Apple from getting into the search game.</strong> That might seem weird, but many times during the case, Apple reps made clear that the Google deal was a set of handcuffs in this regard. With the arrival of Apple Intelligence, this opens the door to a new Apple search product.</p><p><strong>Google can't acquire search competitors without prior consent from DoJ and Plaintiff States</strong>. So now's the time to innovate in the ad space, I guess?</p><p>Now, Android stuff.</p><blockquote><p>Google must not use its control of Android or any other product or service to switch the default [search engine] or to install or switch a Search Access Point.</p></blockquote><p>Holy crap. So basically they need to allow you to remove Google search from Android. Indeed, later on in Section V, it is enumerated that no Google Search product or AI product can be "mandatory" in Android.</p><p>The strictures are worth reading in full. And if Google doesn't like it, Justice allows them to choose to divest of Android instead of complying!</p>

<p>Oh damn there it is: <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2024/11/20/24300617/doj-google-search-antitrust-chrome-breakup" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://www.</span><span class="ellipsis">theverge.com/2024/11/20/243006</span><span class="invisible">17/doj-google-search-antitrust-chrome-breakup</span></a></p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@film_girl" class="u-url mention">@<span>film_girl</span></a></span> Not sure if you saw this bit — we’re recommending people use Git with Pinwheel. <a href="https://bjango.com/help/pinwheel/versioncontrol/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">bjango.com/help/pinwheel/versi</span><span class="invisible">oncontrol/</span></a></p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@film_girl" class="u-url mention">@<span>film_girl</span></a></span> Thank you so much! ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️ ❤️</p>

<p>Congrats to Marc and crew! Insta-buy!<br /><a href="https://mastodon.social/@marcedwards/113509254462647647" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer" translate="no"><span class="invisible">https://</span><span class="ellipsis">mastodon.social/@marcedwards/1</span><span class="invisible">13509254462647647</span></a></p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> CRT? Did you mean cute?</p>

<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@whitequark" class="u-url mention">@<span>whitequark</span></a></span> i read this as &quot;in your mouth&quot; and it took me a minute to figure out how this worked logistically</p>