<p>I&#39;ve said what I can about &quot;prompt engineering,&quot; why the idea is facile nonsense, the complete lack of theoretical and empirical basis, and the organizational impact of promoting on the basis of &quot;prompt engineering&quot; skills.</p><p>But there&#39;s something else to be said, I think, about the underlying fallacy that makes &quot;prompt engineering&quot; appear to be real: namely, the incorrect assumption that LLMs can be &quot;programmed&quot; at all.</p>
Reply