<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://infosec.exchange/@catsalad" class="u-url mention">@<span>catsalad</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mozilla.social/@mozilla" class="u-url mention">@<span>mozilla</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@torproject" class="u-url mention">@<span>torproject</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@eff" class="u-url mention">@<span>eff</span></a></span> The second paragraph is of particular importance since that also explains why AdGuard is supporting it (see Google's announcement) and the "wider ad blocking community" (i.e., all the bullshit that's not the one true blocker aka uBO) is okay with it. They sell ad blockers and lists as a product. They're okay with not blocking everything (like YT), especially if noone else can do it anymore because the competition (uBO) is sidelined.</p><p>This push is not against ad blockers actually, it's against effective ad blockers, particularly uBO.</p>
