<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Popehat" class="u-url mention">@<span>Popehat</span></a></span> </p><p>Thanks, Ken, for defending against Stanford student King Vivek Vanga's gross lawsuit. His sense of entitlement would make the most mild mannered person seethe, as would his lawyer's BNCL's version of the facts, which relies heavily on abuse of the passive voice. </p><p>As Mike Masnick observes, whether Vanga was drunk is almost beside the point, other than as an element of one or more charges. Absent intoxication, his rear-ending a vehicle and causing death is more reckless and egregious.</p>
