<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@samth" class="u-url mention">@<span>samth</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://types.pl/@wilbowma" class="u-url mention">@<span>wilbowma</span></a></span> I don&#39;t see that to be the case at all... </p><p>The thing that makes &quot;Gee, I bet Harvard / Cambridge / Whatever is really good because it is famous!&quot; shower-thoughts fundamentally different from &quot;This extremely detailed website says that CMU is the best CS department ever&quot; is precisely that the latter comes with some &quot;evidence&quot; and so it carries more weight automatically among unfamiliar people, whereas the evidence-free &quot;Harvard Cool!&quot; thing carries comparatively less weight among unfamiliar people.</p><p>So if you consider the relative consequences of &quot;Harvard is best b/c it is the most famous name!&quot; being wrong and &quot;CMU is best because of all this evidence!&quot; being wrong, obviously the consequences of the latter are far more grave because people would have taken it more seriously.</p>
Reply