<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/@jonmsterling" class="u-url mention">@<span>jonmsterling</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://hci.social/@chrisamaphone" class="u-url mention">@<span>chrisamaphone</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/@MartinEscardo" class="u-url mention">@<span>MartinEscardo</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mathstodon.xyz/@HarrisonGrodin" class="u-url mention">@<span>HarrisonGrodin</span></a></span> Sorry, I clearly misinterpreted what you intended there. </p><p>I think basically everyone in PL is doing "honest" work, but broadly there is not a consensus on subject matter, aims, methods, or success criteria across PL and that prevents people from writing like Martin wants. Sometimes that takes the form of suggesting that other people aren't doing good work, and I'm sorry that I wrongly interpreted your statement that way.</p>
