OCamlot - github feature proposal simulator

Bloplang Pull Request #48592: Add <code>zip</code> method to iterators :gh_closed_1::gh_closed_2::gh_closed_3::bean_red: This is a proposal to add the <code>zip</code> method to iterators. This would allow you to join two iterators together, alternating between results from both. E.g. <code>tens.zip(hundreds)</code> would give <code>[10, 100, 20, 200, 30]...</code>. This has been the most requested feature on our wishlist for seven months, and my initial implementation here provides a 12% speed up on the <code>test_cases/thousands_of_types.blop</code>. 👍 532 👎 12 🚀 226 👀 114 😕 3:bot: BlobBot says: Hi red_bean :bean_red: ! Thanks for opening a pull request to Bloplang! I've run your code, and found this: Maximum regression: 0.05%. Maximum improvement: 12.03%. I've assigned curly_brace :curly_brace: to approve your code. Don't forget to leave a star! 👍 221 🚀 179 👀 12:bot: BlopBot added the "BlopBot Seal of Approval" "No regressions" labels.:rct_guest: I've never heard of "zip" before. Googling it, it seems to be a compression algorithm? Not sure what this has to do with iterators. I suggest naming it <code>interleave</code> instead. 👍 23 👎 34:bean_red: <code>zip</code> seems to be pretty widely accepted. For example, Rust and Python call it <code>zip</code>. 👍 27 😕 1:green_is_my_pepper: yeah i've never head of zip before. interleave is too long tho, how about weave 👍 54 👎 27↕️ This comment was marked as off-topic.ℹ️ :curly_brace: requested 1 change.<blockquote>:curly_brace: This <code>for</code> loop could be better expressed as a <code>map</code>. 😕 1</blockquote>:acnl_smile: How about <code>spritz</code>? In the idiolect of English spoken by my Discord server, <code>spritz</code> is very commonly used to refer to mixing things together. EDIT If you're going to laugh react, please leave a comment explaining why. 👍 5 😆 143:green_is_my_pepper: wtf is a spritz 👎 5 😕 26↕️ This comment was marked as off-topic.↕️ This comment was marked as off-topic.:curly_brace: Please don't leave "+1" comments. They pollute the thread and send useless emails. Use the react feature to add thumbs ups to the pull request if you want to express your approval. 👍 118 👎 4:gynecologist: who else is here from reddit? 👎 122 😆 16 😕 33<ul><li>[ Click to load 281 additional comments ] *</li></ul>:curly_brace: That's a bug with your Linux distribution’s <code>zip</code> command, which has nothing to do with Bloplang. Open a thread on the Fedora forums to discuss that, although they'll probably tell you that Fedora 32 is EOL. 👍 66:rct_guest: Okay, so we have 17 votes in favour of <code>zip</code>, 12 for <code>weave</code>, 5 for <code>spritz</code>, and somehow only 2 for <code>interleave</code>. Oh, and 1 each for <code>sprinkle</code>, <code>intersperse_at_least_two_iterators_with_each_other</code>, and <code>sum</code>. I'm beginning to suspect botting. 👍 7 😕 12 :curly_brace: Hey read bean :bean_red: - this pull request is out of sync with <code>main</code>. Could you rebase on top of the twelve thousand commits that have occurred since you opened this? Thanks! 👍 63 🚀 2:gale: whats stoping this from being merged? can we get an eta 👍 12 😕 2:rct_guest: It's mostly a debate on the name to use. I'm not sure why people aren't voting for <code>interleave</code>. I've provided numerous arguments as to why it's the obvious option, and I've even linked a conversation with ChatGPT 4-o proving that it makes the most sense. Sigh. 👍 2 😕 70 😆 11ℹ️ Pull request #53223 "Add interleave method to iterators" was marked as a duplicate of this one.↕️ This comment was marked as off-topic.🤖 No activity detected for 90 days. 👎 121 😕 89Stalebot 🤖 marked this pull request as stale.Conversation locked and limited to contributors.