<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://types.pl/@krismicinski" class="u-url mention">@<span>krismicinski</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://discuss.systems/@ricci" class="u-url mention">@<span>ricci</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://discuss.systems/@dan" class="u-url mention">@<span>dan</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://recurse.social/@lindsey" class="u-url mention">@<span>lindsey</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@shriramk" class="u-url mention">@<span>shriramk</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@sbrunthaler" class="u-url mention">@<span>sbrunthaler</span></a></span> <span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@regehr" class="u-url mention">@<span>regehr</span></a></span> we could probably start a csrankings fork if u guys have specific problems with the methodology</p><p>ive a feeling that no matter what methodology you use, gaming the rankings is probably going to be the norm, so idk if a fork is going to fix that, but creating incentives against collaborations does not sound good :/</p><p>idk much about csrankings tho (im slightly embarrassed to say that ive discovered it only recently)</p>