<p><span class="h-card" translate="no"><a href="https://mastodon.social/@Meyerweb" class="u-url mention">@<span>Meyerweb</span></a></span> Correct. The court absolved itself of picking a clearly unconstitutional and unscientific policy by kicking it into a referendum so they could avoid making a decision. </p><p>Though, recall, Solomon proposed the solution because he was faced with a liar and a truth teller. He used it to provoke the truth—in this case, the referendum passing—so perhaps giving more credit to the court than I intend.</p>